<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not Indeed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisblogisoverrated.com/2008/06/30/why-not-indeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisblogisoverrated.com/2008/06/30/why-not-indeed/</link>
	<description>Technopopulist contrarianism. (Technocontrarianist populism?)</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bananarama</title>
		<link>http://www.thisblogisoverrated.com/2008/06/30/why-not-indeed/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bananarama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisblogisoverrated.com/?p=26#comment-107</guid>
		<description>But if a certain kind of fiction causes cancer in a test group of innocent monkeys, then perhaps that kind of fiction should be abandoned...

     D. Bo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if a certain kind of fiction causes cancer in a test group of innocent monkeys, then perhaps that kind of fiction should be abandoned&#8230;</p>
<p>     D. Bo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
